The third round of quantitative loose is imperative. The United States is more and more of the default risk may repay debt default and pressure, once the debt default come true, affected the economic impact of home and abroad and credit crisis is a room machine can't match. This morning, opened on July 15,baseball hats the reference message "economic wide Angle, a headline impressively suck eye" the fed hinted that launched the third round of quantitative loose, "the U.S. stock market tumbled down even three days, international commodity prices, the gold price per ounce of nearly $1590 and record high. Federal reserve chairman Ben bernanke put words: "if economic weakness and inflation is down, the fed ready to further easing." As early as June 24, the author once the review and lt; the fed continue to PangShi scam stagflation expected last optimistic & gt under market; the article "(published articles chain http://qingqingdefeng_aa.m.oeeee.com/blog/archive/2011/6/24/2492221.html) are pointed out:" the future there will be the third round of quantitative looser monetary policy, or similar quantitative loose monetary policy ". Please see the leaves wingceltis of the federal reserve will PangShi scam stagflation expected next market unaccountable optimistic "article, have so a words:" the federal reserve will tolerate inflation, inflation for approval to promote economic theory bashful. Unable to push inflation, but will really depend on economic bill. The Wall Street journal columnist BrettArends pointed out that the American economy might be needed for inflation." This passage does wonderful. China might it not so? Just do not say, do not recognize. This leaves wingceltis recuperation, so-called elite have also dare not speak. The author as early as in late 2009 the central economic work conference before and after, as the article by the article predicted when the government had to take the moderate inflation to solve the amount put brought about by the systematic economic problems, because of the economic problems with China systematic compared, moral bottom line calculate what? We face reality, only a little more than just understand to the government. According to the world economic TanWenZhang leaves and movements, the strategic goal of the currency with the United States, the author thinks that the future will be the third round of quantitative looser monetary policy, or similar quantitative looser monetary policy, Ming is to develop the economy and employment, dark look into the world is emerging economies and to the European currency rout, protect the U.S. position and take over the world's dominant currency status and the largest dollar economic interests. If so, China is also one of the countries the brunt, so that China's inflation problem is not as elite of prediction "first high low", year end or early next year, the central economic work conference may have to raise inflation cordon, to this, the national should have inflation expectations and tolerate high to go. When a cluster of economic information and dynamic and the United States will dominate the global economy string and up, it is not difficult to get a comprehensive financial economic logic conclusion: America's third round of quantitative loose imperative, and the third round after quantification loose, are not stop at the third round of quantitative loose, in the coming years there will be the fourth and fifth...... Round of quantitative loose, until no one has the world currency $rib status. Whether emerging economies, or the United States of the economic community of the euro vassal state, who rise is a to U.S. secretly sad and can't stand of the interests of the problem. In China of "harmonious" international economic atmosphere, there must be more strategic strategy, prevent excessive monetary quantitative loose, urgent need for development and growth and the good may be the short-sighted,Cheap sunglasses was his rope and my breath. China's economic debate "soft landing" or "a hard landing," happy Chinese economy "soft landing" or sad to see China's economic "hard", actually all is to pay attention to the fire destroyed "fire" process, not destroy "fire" results and pay cost. In early ninety, China is not had to realize the economic "soft landing" success evidence? China also has no economic "hard" of "success" evidence. China to achieve economic "soft landing" success is evidence-the whole "fire" fire extinguishing the price of process take almost cost is across two centuries of two-thirds of the time and $4 trillion bank loan bad debt "stripping", difficult to calculate the huge loss of state-owned enterprises and inspected cadres and workers laid off. The historical facts should be worth more scholars' attention and thinking, this is China to achieve economic "to a soft landing" or "a hard landing" must face a harsh and tragic results. Avoid this ordeal and sad result, talking about the "soft landing" or "a hard landing" are sad formalism. Third, China's economy not escape the United States four... Round of quantitative looser monetary sniper, this is the scholar more attention should be focused on and support of the host.

see more:Sing praises to the China banking regulatory commission
Be knowledgeable person eat, chinese-invested enterprises that to stand