In Africa build hope primary school is not wrong, want to do "benevolence two generations" is not wrong; Callings public offering foundation, but take the form of private to operate, in the governance structure and information disclosure on key issues such as outside, overflowing the legal boundaries, this is wrong. Official charity constantly questioned by public opinion group, the central background of youth development foundation "Lou meimei" after the Red Cross "GuoMeiMei event" was grilled out again. Two "mei" to get a saliva, why? "Lou meimei" this life LuXingYu, at 24. And GuoMeiMei claim to imagine the "Red Cross business general manager" position is different, LuXingYu are as "central African hope project" executive chairman and secretary general, global Chinese businessman future leaders club secretary general, real participate in the administration of hundreds of millions of yuan project.NFL hats She drew questioned, on the surface, a as its "rich the second generation" identity, secondly the age, three for the involved in the project, it is actually in Africa rebuilding hope primary school. In Beijing officials raised the threshold, starting a new primary school children of migrant to shut the tide, "Africa hope primary school" project seems particularly startling. However, the specific for hope project, central Africa, need in two to observe. Enterprise will involve rebuilding in Africa some hope primary school, want to accord with the donor will, this itself is not a bad thing, and not to be. And LuXingYu himself, as long as it is by the proper, legal procedures to participate in the charity project, can be competent work, then age and family background is not her fault. At present the central African hope project, set background and the specific details is not completely clear. Is known information to see, actually this kind of project could also through a private foundation to operate. And QingJiHui aspect, also claimed that projects for the enterprise and their cooperation of a special fund, the fund is by partner to enterprises chinesebusinessman association directional fundraising, and no public offering of plan. However, if through a private foundation to operation, whether from the program, and the difficulty of the operation, or from the project popularity and so on into consideration, Africa hope project is much less than the direct and QingJiHui cooperation is more convenient. The problem is, QingJiHui itself is a quite high popularity of the public offering foundation, its disclosure and regulatory requirements and private foundation has a lot of difference. For example, in personnel arrangement, the fund management regulations ", with the private property of the non-public foundation set up, allow mutual have close relatives of the relationship between foundation directors exist, total control must be in the total number of less than a third, and public offering in the foundation, has close relatives of the relationship must not at the same time in the office. In the information disclosure, public offering foundation also should assume more obligation, such as organization fundraising event, whether activities before, activities, or the campaign to disclose fundraising after special situation, including capital pooled to carry out after the public welfare activity and the detailed plan funds use, fundraising have income and used to carry out the cost of public welfare activities, etc; And private foundation to the public because without fundraising, do not have the disclosure obligation, the bottom line is to regulators responsible for and donors. Control the above the standard, and on the other side of the coin, the project affiliated public offering foundation, but take the form of private to operate, whether governance structure or information disclosure, and other key issues, is quite have the cross of idea. In addition to LuXingYu and his father in the project of the relationships among relatives, whether central African hope project, or China QingJiHui,NBA hats are not announced project financial report. From the project operation mode to see, is a kind of both enjoy the convenience of public offerings of new foundation, and do not take public offering of foundation the obligation of "dozen outside" of type selection, also not not lets a person associate to project or can't see the light place. Since the foundation of public offering brand and resources to run the charity project, Africa hope primary school program also should accord with the public offering the disclosure of the foundation and supervision requirements, strictly carry out, let the public convinced. For example, the African hope primary school project, QingJiHui extraction of even 10% of the management fee, also cause public criticism. In fact according to international practice, charity to draw a reasonable cost management, project scale, the greater the need to the management expenses nature is more also. But in the current lack of transparency, the lack of effective supervision system, to public QingJiHui in Africa hope primary school projects within the limit of 10% extraction regulations are hard to accept also cost in reason. But the AIDS comparison, oxfam Hong Kong project in mainland of administrative expenses, namely control under 3%, much lower than the fund management regulations of the mainland by the standard of 10%. In fact, the net friend again and again to question China charity, especially the official charity, actually comes from the charity mode deep system defects, such as lack of transparency, a lack of supervision and the use of fund and inefficient, and may even shelter evil people and practices, although of, by, but no reliable guarantee mechanism donations to the people. If in the long run, not a radical and reflection of the adjustment, will hurt public confidence, will damage the China charity the development of the career.

see more:Large competition, operators of knowing and doing
China enterprise why not the American market